Schemets
Back to Blog

Say Goodbye to REST: Rethinking Backends with Convex’s Reactive Model

Is REST holding your modern app back? Discover how Convex’s reactive model eliminates polling, cache invalidation, and API glue code, offering a superior architecture for real-time applications.

Nicola Violante
ConvexReactive BackendREST API AlternativesReal-time DevelopmentModern BackendTypeScriptServerlessFrontend Data FetchingCache InvalidationWebSocketsDeveloper ExperienceAPI DesignFull-stack DevelopmentLive UpdatesArchitecture

For nearly two decades, REST (Representational State Transfer) has been the undisputed king of web architecture. It brought structure to the chaos of early web integration, relying on statelessness and standard HTTP verbs to manage resources. In a world of static documents and occasional form submissions, REST was—and still is—brilliant.

But the web has changed.

Today's applications are not digital filing cabinets; they are living, breathing, collaborative environments. Users expect dashboards that update live, chat windows that never stale, and collaborative documents that reflect changes instantly.

Attempting to build these "real-time first" experiences on the foundation of REST is like trying to stream 4K video over a dial-up connection: you might get it to work eventually, but the friction is immense.

It is time to rethink how our backends communicate with our frontends. It is time to move away from the "ask and wait" model of REST and embrace the Reactive Model championed by Convex.

The Unspoken Frustration with REST

We’ve all been there. You are building a feature as simple as a comment section. In a RESTful world, the friction begins almost immediately.

1. The Polling Problem & WebSocket Fatigue

How do you show a new comment when it arrives? You have two bad choices:

  • Polling: You set up a setInterval to hammer your own server every 5 seconds. It’s inefficient, creates unnecessary load, and the data is always slightly stale.
  • WebSockets: You decide to "do it right" and open a WebSocket connection. Suddenly, you are managing connection states, heartbeats, reconnection logic, and maintaining a separate Pub/Sub infrastructure alongside your REST API.

2. Cache Invalidation Hell

There is an old saying in computer science: "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things."

In a REST architecture, the client fetches data and stores it in a local state (Redux, TanStack Query, Apollo). The moment that data lands on the client, it is technically stale. If a user performs a mutation, you must manually determine which queries to invalidate or refetch. It is a breeding ground for bugs where the UI shows one thing, but the database says another.

3. The "Glue Code" Tax

Perhaps the biggest productivity killer is the sheer amount of boilerplate required to bridge the gap between backend and frontend. You write a database query, then a backend controller, then a DTO (Data Transfer Object), then a frontend API client, and finally a React hook to manage the loading/error/success states.

This is API Glue Code. It adds no business value; it just moves bytes from A to B.

A New Paradigm: The Reactive Backend

Convex approaches backend development from a fundamentally different angle. Instead of an imperative Request/Response cycle, Convex utilizes a declarative Subscription model.

In the Convex model, the frontend does not ask, "Can I see the current state?" Instead, it declares, "I am interested in this query. Keep me updated."

How It Works

  1. Reactive Queries: You write a backend function in TypeScript. The frontend subscribes to it.
  2. Automatic Push: When the data underlying that query changes in the database, Convex automatically re-runs the query and pushes the new result to the client.
  3. Consistency: There is no manual cache invalidation. If the database changes, the UI changes.

Let's look at the difference in code.

The Old Way (REST + React)

Implementing a live-updating list in a traditional stack often looks like this:

// ❌ The REST Way: Boilerplate heavy & manual sync
import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';

function TodoList() {
  const [todos, setTodos] = useState([]);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);

  const fetchTodos = async () => {
    const res = await fetch('/api/todos');
    const data = await res.json();
    setTodos(data);
    setLoading(false);
  };

  useEffect(() => {
    fetchTodos();
    
    // Polling every 5 seconds because we don't have WebSockets setup
    const interval = setInterval(fetchTodos, 5000); 
    return () => clearInterval(interval);
  }, []);

  if (loading) return <div>Loading...</div>;

  return (
    <ul>
      {todos.map(todo => <li key={todo.id}>{todo.text}</li>)}
    </ul>
  );
}

The Convex Way

With Convex, the mental model shifts. You don't fetch; you subscribe.

// ✅ The Convex Way: Reactive & Clean
import { useQuery } from 'convex/react';
import { api } from '../convex/_generated/api';

function TodoList() {
  // This automatically updates whenever the data changes on the server.
  // No polling. No WebSockets code. No cache invalidation.
  const todos = useQuery(api.todos.list);

  if (!todos) return <div>Loading...</div>;

  return (
    <ul>
      {todos.map(todo => <li key={todo._id}>{todo.text}</li>)}
    </ul>
  );
}

This isn't just syntactic sugar. It is a removal of entire categories of complexity.

Tangible Advantages of Saying Goodbye to REST

When you adopt this reactive model, you aren't just changing your database; you are changing your development velocity.

1. Unparalleled Real-time Out-of-the-Box

Real-time isn't a feature you "add later." It is the default state of the application. Whether you are building a chat app, a stock ticker, or a collaborative whiteboard, the infrastructure for live updates is already running. You delete the polling code, you delete the WebSocket handling code, and the app just feels alive.

2. End-to-End Type Safety

Because Convex is TypeScript-first, the boundary between frontend and backend dissolves. The api.todos.list object in the example above isn't a string; it's a typed reference.

If you change your backend schema or return type, your frontend build fails immediately. You catch errors in your IDE, not in production. This eliminates the "impedance mismatch" where API documentation drifts away from the actual implementation.

3. Simplified Architecture (No More State Management)

In a REST world, global state management libraries (Redux, MobX, Recoil) exist largely to cache server data. With Convex, the backend is your state manager. The Convex client handles caching, deduplication, and subscription management. You can often delete massive chunks of client-side state logic because the source of truth is effectively local.

Where Convex Shines Over REST

While REST is still viable for simple static sites, Convex’s reactive model is superior for:

  • Collaborative Apps: Tools like Figma, Linear, or Notion where multiple users manipulate the same data simultaneously.
  • Activity Feeds & Chat: Social platforms where content is constantly appended.
  • Gaming: Turn-based games or state-heavy interactive experiences requiring low-latency synchronization.
  • Dashboards: Analytics platforms where data freshness is critical for decision-making.

Is REST Completely Dead?

To be nuanced: no. REST (and GraphQL) still has a place.

If you are building a public-facing API for third-party developers, REST is still the standard for interoperability. If you are integrating with legacy banking systems or performing heavy batch processing that doesn't require UI feedback, REST works fine.

However, for the internal API of a modern, full-stack web application—the pipe that connects your React frontend to your database—REST is increasingly becoming technical debt.

Conclusion: Embracing the Future

We often cling to technologies because they are familiar. We accept the pain of cache invalidation and the tedium of writing API boilerplate because "that's just how web development works."

But it doesn't have to be.

The reactive model represents a shift toward Intent-Based Architectures, where developers express what data they need, and the system handles how to deliver it and keep it fresh.

Convex isn't just an alternative to Firebase or Supabase; it is an argument that the Request/Response cycle is the wrong primitive for building user interfaces. By saying goodbye to REST for your internal backend, you say hello to a cleaner codebase, happier developers, and a product that feels instantaneous to your users.

Ready to stop polling and start reacting? Start building with Convex today.

Ready to visualize your Convex backend?

Load your Convex folder and explore your schema with interactive tables, relationships, and chat with BackendBOT for intelligent insights.

Related Articles

Real-Time Collaboration Made Easy: Build a Shared To-Do List with Convex.dev

Stop wrestling with WebSockets. Build a fully collaborative, real-time to-do list in minutes with Convex.dev and Next.js using this step-by-step guide.

ConvexReal-timeCollaborationNext.jsReactTypeScriptTo-Do ListFull-stack DevelopmentBackend as a ServiceLive UpdatesWebSockets AlternativeDeveloper ExperienceTutorialShared State
Read more →

Convex Cloud vs. Self-Hosted: Choosing Your Backend (Pros, Cons & Use Cases)

Deciding between self-hosting the open-source Convex backend or using the managed Convex Cloud? We break down the pros, cons, and hidden costs to help you choose.

ConvexSelf-HostingCloud ComputingBaaSBackend-as-a-ServiceManaged ServicesOpen SourceDeveloper ExperienceScalabilityRealtimeTypeScriptBackend DevelopmentComparisonSupabaseServerless
Read more →

Navigating the BaaS Landscape: A Deep Dive into Convex, Firebase, and Supabase for Modern Web Development

The backend landscape has evolved. We pit the giants against the challengers—Convex vs. Firebase vs. Supabase—to help you decide which platform delivers the speed, scalability, and developer experience your next project demands.

BaaSBackend-as-a-ServiceConvexFirebaseSupabaseBackend ComparisonReal-time BackendType-safe BackendWeb DevelopmentModern BackendDeveloper ExperienceSQLNoSQLPostgreSQLAuthenticationServerless FunctionsTypeScriptJavaScriptNext.jsReactOpen Source BaaSCloud BackendDatabase ComparisonChoosing BaaS
Read more →